Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
Bernd Eckenfels wrote:In article <[email protected]> you wrote:I believe that on 64 bit platforms, Linux has a 64 bit clean VFS. Python says 2**64 is 18446744073709551616, and that's roughly:18,446,744,073,709,551,616 bytes 18,446,744,073,709 megs 18,446,744,073 gigs 18,446,744 terabytes 18,446 ... what are those, pedabytes (petabytes?) 18 zetabytesThere you go. I deal with this a lot so, those are the names.Linux is currently limited to 16 TB per VFS mount point, it's all mute, unless VFS gets fixed.mmap won't go above this at present.
What does "it's all mute" mean? -- -bill davidsen ([email protected]) "The secret to procrastination is to put things off until the last possible moment - but no longer" -me - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: what is our answer to ZFS?
- From: "Jeff V. Merkey" <[email protected]>
- Re: what is our answer to ZFS?
- From: "Randy.Dunlap" <[email protected]>
- Re: what is our answer to ZFS?
- References:
- Re: what is our answer to ZFS?
- From: Bernd Eckenfels <[email protected]>
- Re: what is our answer to ZFS?
- From: "Jeff V. Merkey" <[email protected]>
- Re: what is our answer to ZFS?
- Prev by Date: Re: How can I prevent MTD to access the end of a flash device ?
- Next by Date: [patch] hdaps: missing an axis.
- Previous by thread: Re: what is our answer to ZFS?
- Next by thread: Re: what is our answer to ZFS?
- Index(es):
 |