Re: How can I prevent MTD to access the end of a flash device ?

[Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>]

On Tue, 22 Nov 2005, Franck wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I have two questions that I can't answer by my own. I tried to look at
> FAQ and documentation on MTD website but found no answer.

Please consider using the MTD mailing list next time (you certainly read 
about it on the MTD web site).

> First question is about size of flash. I have a Intel strataflash
> whose size is 32MB but because of a buggy platform hardware I can't
> access to the last 64KB of the flash. How can I make MTD module aware
> of this new size. The restricted map size is initialized by my driver
> but it doesn't seem to be used by MTD.

The easiest thing to do is to define MTD partitions, the last one being 
the excluded flash area.

> The second question is about the "cacheable" mapping field in map_info
> structure. I looked at others drivers and this field seems to be
> optional.

It is.

> Does this field, if set, improve flash access a lot ?

Yes.  It was tested on ARM only though.  Some architectures like i386 
for example might need special tricks to implement this.

> Should I set up a cacheable mapping ?

Consider the comment for the inval_cache method in 
include/linux/mtd/map.h and look at lubbock-flash.c for example.


Nicolas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/