Re: [PATCH 4/5] Centralise NO_IRQ definition

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> By centralizing NO_IRQ, you either have to break a lot of existing PC 
> setups, or you have to potentially break (far fewer) PowerPC setups. So 
> let's not do it at all.

I have no strong feeling vs. centralized or not centralized NO_IRQ
value. All I want is NO_IRQ to exist on all archs so I can fix the few
drivers that assume that 0 is no irq.

Ben.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux