Re: [PATCH 4/5] Centralise NO_IRQ definition

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] Centralise NO_IRQ definition
From: David Howells <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 11:12:36 +0000
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>, Andrew Morton <[email protected]>, Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>, [email protected], Russell King <[email protected]>, Ian Molton <[email protected]>, David Howells <[email protected]>, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]>, Paul Mackerras <[email protected]>
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]

Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]> wrote:

> +#define NO_IRQ			((unsigned int)(-1))

Should this be wrapped with #ifndef?

David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 4/5] Centralise NO_IRQ definition
  - From: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH 4/5] Centralise NO_IRQ definition
  - From: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: intel8x0 sound of silence on dell system
Next by Date: Re: Kernel 2.6.14.2 - Hard link count is wrong
Previous by thread: [PATCH 4/5] Centralise NO_IRQ definition
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 4/5] Centralise NO_IRQ definition
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]

Powered by Linux