On Mon, 21 Nov 2005, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 11:47 -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > Remove the gotos. Something like this. It would be nice if we could remove
> > the printk. Hmm....
>
> Definite improvement to my patch. I think I like Joe's suggestion
> better, though. (Any mistakes in the following are mine.)
If we drop the printk then this may be even simpler
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
Index: linux-2.6.15-rc1-mm2/mm/slab.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.15-rc1-mm2.orig/mm/slab.c 2005-11-21 13:16:07.000000000 -0800
+++ linux-2.6.15-rc1-mm2/mm/slab.c 2005-11-21 13:16:59.000000000 -0800
@@ -2890,21 +2890,14 @@ void *kmem_cache_alloc_node(kmem_cache_t
unsigned long save_flags;
void *ptr;
- if (nodeid == -1)
- return __cache_alloc(cachep, flags);
-
- if (unlikely(!cachep->nodelists[nodeid])) {
- /* Fall back to __cache_alloc if we run into trouble */
- printk(KERN_WARNING "slab: not allocating in inactive node %d for cache %s\n", nodeid, cachep->name);
- return __cache_alloc(cachep,flags);
- }
-
cache_alloc_debugcheck_before(cachep, flags);
local_irq_save(save_flags);
- if (nodeid == numa_node_id())
+
+ if (nodeid == -1 || nodeid == numa_node_id() || !cachep->nodelists[nodeid])
ptr = ____cache_alloc(cachep, flags);
else
ptr = __cache_alloc_node(cachep, flags, nodeid);
+
local_irq_restore(save_flags);
ptr = cache_alloc_debugcheck_after(cachep, flags, ptr, __builtin_return_address(0));
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
