On Mon, 21 Nov 2005, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
> This patch gets rid of one if-else statement by moving current node allocation
> check at the beginning of kmem_cache_alloc_node().
The problem with this is that the numa_node may change if irqs are still
active and your patch moves the check for the numa node outside of the
section where irqs are enabled.
You could move the check for -1 into the section where interrupts are
disabled.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
