Mel wrote:
> +#define __GFP_EASYRCLM ((__force gfp_t)0x80000u)
>
> Comment to right removed because the comment above the declaration covers
> everything.
(repeating myself)
> How about fitting the style (casts, just one line) of the other flags,
> so that these added six lines become instead just the one line:
There is a consistent layout, one-per-line, to the other __GFP_*
flags. The information content of the extra five lines you use for
the __GFP_EASYRCLM flag does not warrant upsetting that layout, in
my view.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <[email protected]> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
