Re: [PATCH 1/5] Light Fragmentation Avoidance V20: 001_antidefrag_flags

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 15 Nov 2005, Paul Jackson wrote:

> Mel wrote:
> >  #define __GFP_VALID	((__force gfp_t)0x80000000u) /* valid GFP flags */
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Allocation type modifier
> > + * __GFP_EASYRCLM: Easily reclaimed pages like userspace or buffer pages
> > + */
> > +#define __GFP_EASYRCLM   0x80000u  /* User and other easily reclaimed pages */
> > +
>
> How about fitting the style (casts, just one line) of the other flags,
> so that these added six lines become instead just the one line:
>
>    #define __GFP_EASYRCLM   ((__force gfp_t)0x80000u)  /* easily reclaimed pages */
>
> (Yeah - it was probably me that asked for -more- comments sometime in
> the past - consistency is not my strong suit ;).
>

No, you're right, my declaration is wrong. Changed to

+#define __GFP_EASYRCLM   ((__force gfp_t)0x80000u)

Comment to right removed because the comment above the declaration covers
everything.

-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Java Applications Developer
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux