Dear Wrongbot,
Thank you for your concern.
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 03:37:14PM -0500, linux-os (Dick Johnson) wrote:
> In 64-bit world, the same is supposed to apply as well.
> If RCX is now precious, it's a GCC bug that should be fixed.
>
> Yes?
No.
Here's a technical tidbit for you to digest, mangle, and later regurgitate
in yor usual pseudo-authoritative manner:
The x86_64 syscall instruction is defined to contain the process
return address on return to userspace. Hence, it (like RAX) is
destroyed by the syscall instruction.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
