Re: [PATCH] backup timer for UARTs that lose interrupts (take 2)

On Wed, 16 Nov 2005, George Anzinger wrote:

> Could you _please_ not put inline patches after the signature mark ("-- ").  In my mailer (mozilla)
> this causes the patch to be greyed out and, more importantly, NOT included in a reply.  This, in
> turn, makes it hard to comment on details in the patch.

Would it help if Alex used the documented canonical patch format,
using "---" instead of "-- "?  I sorta doubt it.

BTW, George, please hit Return/Enter around column 70+...
Thanks.

---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] backup timer for UARTs that lose interrupts (take 2)
  - From: George Anzinger <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH] backup timer for UARTs that lose interrupts (take 2)
  - From: Alex Williamson <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] backup timer for UARTs that lose interrupts (take 2)
  - From: George Anzinger <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [RFC] HOWTO do Linux kernel development - take 2
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] backup timer for UARTs that lose interrupts (take 2)
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] backup timer for UARTs that lose interrupts (take 2)
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] backup timer for UARTs that lose interrupts (take 2)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]