Re: [PATCH] backup timer for UARTs that lose interrupts (take 2)

On Wed, 16 Nov 2005, George Anzinger wrote:

> Could you _please_ not put inline patches after the signature mark ("-- ").  In my mailer (mozilla)
> this causes the patch to be greyed out and, more importantly, NOT included in a reply.  This, in
> turn, makes it hard to comment on details in the patch.


Would it help if Alex used the documented canonical patch format,
using "---" instead of "-- "?  I sorta doubt it.

BTW, George, please hit Return/Enter around column 70+...
Thanks.

---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] backup timer for UARTs that lose interrupts (take 2)
    • From: George Anzinger <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] backup timer for UARTs that lose interrupts (take 2)
    • From: Alex Williamson <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] backup timer for UARTs that lose interrupts (take 2)
    • From: George Anzinger <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [RFC] HOWTO do Linux kernel development - take 2
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] backup timer for UARTs that lose interrupts (take 2)
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] backup timer for UARTs that lose interrupts (take 2)
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] backup timer for UARTs that lose interrupts (take 2)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]