Re: [PATCH] libata error handling fixes (ATAPI)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 16 2005, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Jens Axboe wrote:
> >I updated that patch, and converted IDE and SCSI to use it. See the
> >results here:
> >
> >http://brick.kernel.dk/git/?p=linux-2.6-block.git;a=shortlog;h=blk-softirq
> >
> >The main change from the version posted last october is killing the
> >'slightly' overdesigned completion queue hashing.
> 
> Nifty, I like.  Comments:
> 
> * use of spin_lock_irq() in all completion paths now makes me nervous.

Should be fine from the paths originating from blk_done_softirq(), as we
know interrupts are enabled in the first place. But generally I agree,
whenever in doubt always always use the irq saving variants.

> * certainly it's what SCSI does now, but is a softirq really necessary? 
>  Using a tasklet would kill all that per-cpu code, and notifier.

It would work fine with a tasklet of course, but it's going to generate
a _lot_ of traffic on io busy systems so I felt a dedicated softirq was
the way to go.

-- 
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux