On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 23:21 +0100, Jörn Engel wrote:
> On Tue, 8 November 2005 19:57:49 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >
> > The code _is_ ugly and ioctls are out of fashion, but your "remove it"
> > request is just silly as long as you dont provide a reasonable
> > alternative access to those bits.
>
> You may have noticed the missing patch and figured that it was not a
> formal request for removal. Still, I'll be happy when it's gone and
> am also happy that mtdchar mess is not spread over yet another file
> anymore. Thanks, Arnd.
I'm deeply impressed by your insight and caring about Linux source code
quality. Thanks, Joern.
Complaining about legacy mess is easy blurb. Providing a clean solution
is obviously not on your agenda.
tglx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
