Re: [Fwd: [PATCH] [PNP][RFC] Suspend support for PNP bus.]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On 11/4/05, Pierre Ossman <[email protected]> wrote:
Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
Hmm, would'nt presence of such device stop suspend process? It will
cause pnp_bus_resume to fail too. Perhaps returning 0 in this case is
better.


The problem is that this code is also visited from pnp_activate_dev() &
co where this return value is needed. For pnp_stop_dev() the same check
(pnp_can_disable()) is performed in the suspend routine to avoid that
particular problem. For resume my assumption was that a device that
doesn't support activation will not have a driver attached to it.
Perhaps this is wrong?


i8042 registers drivers for keyboard and AUX ports to gather
information whether the ports are present and what IRQ and IO ports
shoudl be used to access them. And I have seen a few boxes that do not
alloe [de]activate these devices.


But the activation is performed by the PNP layer when the driver is matched with a driver. So the driver isn't really responsible for the activation. It can prevent activation through PNP_DRIVER_RES_DO_NOT_CHANGE though, but that flag is also checked in the suspend routines.

Rgds
Pierre
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux