Re: [Fwd: [PATCH] [PNP][RFC] Suspend support for PNP bus.]

[Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>]

On 11/4/05, Pierre Ossman <drzeus-list@drzeus.cx> wrote:
> +
> +int pnp_start_dev(struct pnp_dev *dev)
> +{
> +       if (!pnp_can_write(dev)) {
> +               pnp_info("Device %s does not supported activation.", dev->dev.bus_id);

"...does not support...", there is no "ed" at the end.

> +               return -EINVAL;
> +       }

Hmm, would'nt presence of such device stop suspend process? It will
cause pnp_bus_resume to fail too. Perhaps returning 0 in this case is
better.

> +
> +int pnp_stop_dev(struct pnp_dev *dev)
> +{
> +       if (!pnp_can_disable(dev)) {
> +               pnp_info("Device %s does not supported disabling.", dev->dev.bus_id);
> +               return -EINVAL;

Same here. No "ed" and -EINVAL will hurt.

--
Dmitry
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/