Re: Parallel ATA with libata status with the patches I'm working on

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



My general take on things:

* Supporting PATA has always been a long term libata goal (and people have known this for years).

* I try to stay as far as possible away from the fight between Alan and Bart. As the changelog shows, I've merged libata patches from both.

* Alan's patches do tend to come straight to me, and it would be nice if he CC'd them to a list (linux-ide).

* Nonetheless, they get exposure in -mm (via libata-dev.git) for a while, before going upstream.

* The non-core changes, i.e. Alan and Albert's PATA drivers, aren't going upstream for a while, and will be instead living in -mm (via my "pata-drivers" libata-dev.git branch) Too much breakage and user confusion will occur if they are pushed {today|soon}.

* CONFIG_IDE=n is still largely for developers and brave souls only (or for lucky owners of the newest boxes, which simply don't have PATA on them at all).


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux