--On Thursday, November 03, 2005 11:35:28 -0800 Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Thu, 3 Nov 2005, Martin J. Bligh wrote: >> >> Possibly, I can redo the calculations easily enough (have to go for now, >> but I just sent the other ones). But we don't keep a fixed percentage of >> memory free - we cap it ... perhaps we should though? > > I suspect the capping may well be from some old HIGHMEM interaction on x86 > (ie "don't keep half a gig free in the normal zone just because we have > 16GB in the high-zone". We used to have serious balancing issues, and I > wouldn't be surprised at all if there are remnants from that. Stuff that > simply hasn't been visible, because not a lot of people had many many GB > of memory even on machines that didn't need HIGHMEM. But pages_min is based on the zone size, not the system size. And we still cap it. Maybe that's just a mistake? M. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Lhms-devel] [PATCH 0/7] Fragmentation Avoidance V19
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [Lhms-devel] [PATCH 0/7] Fragmentation Avoidance V19
- References:
- Re: [Lhms-devel] [PATCH 0/7] Fragmentation Avoidance V19
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [Lhms-devel] [PATCH 0/7] Fragmentation Avoidance V19
- From: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
- Re: [Lhms-devel] [PATCH 0/7] Fragmentation Avoidance V19
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [Lhms-devel] [PATCH 0/7] Fragmentation Avoidance V19
- From: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
- Re: [Lhms-devel] [PATCH 0/7] Fragmentation Avoidance V19
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [Lhms-devel] [PATCH 0/7] Fragmentation Avoidance V19
- From: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
- Re: [Lhms-devel] [PATCH 0/7] Fragmentation Avoidance V19
- From: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
- Re: [Lhms-devel] [PATCH 0/7] Fragmentation Avoidance V19
- From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- Re: [Lhms-devel] [PATCH 0/7] Fragmentation Avoidance V19
- From: "Martin J. Bligh" <[email protected]>
- Re: [Lhms-devel] [PATCH 0/7] Fragmentation Avoidance V19
- From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- Re: [Lhms-devel] [PATCH 0/7] Fragmentation Avoidance V19
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: [Lhms-devel] [PATCH 0/7] Fragmentation Avoidance V19
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [Lhms-devel] [PATCH 0/7] Fragmentation Avoidance V19
- From: "Martin J. Bligh" <[email protected]>
- Re: [Lhms-devel] [PATCH 0/7] Fragmentation Avoidance V19
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [Lhms-devel] [PATCH 0/7] Fragmentation Avoidance V19
- From: "Martin J. Bligh" <[email protected]>
- Re: [Lhms-devel] [PATCH 0/7] Fragmentation Avoidance V19
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [Lhms-devel] [PATCH 0/7] Fragmentation Avoidance V19
- Prev by Date: Re: [Lhms-devel] [PATCH 0/7] Fragmentation Avoidance V19
- Next by Date: Re: Parallel ATA with libata status with the patches I'm working on
- Previous by thread: Re: [Lhms-devel] [PATCH 0/7] Fragmentation Avoidance V19
- Next by thread: Re: [Lhms-devel] [PATCH 0/7] Fragmentation Avoidance V19
- Index(es):