Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com> writes: > Do you think that libata is currently so much better wrt to PATA > hot-(un)plug support? For me? Libata works. Old IDE driver doesn't work. To be honest, haven't checked since switched to libata, this problem might be fixed now. -- Krzysztof Halasa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Parallel ATA with libata status with the patches I'm working on
- From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
- Re: Parallel ATA with libata status with the patches I'm working on
- References:
- Parallel ATA with libata status with the patches I'm working on
- From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
- Re: Parallel ATA with libata status with the patches I'm working on
- From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
- Re: Parallel ATA with libata status with the patches I'm working on
- From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
- Re: Parallel ATA with libata status with the patches I'm working on
- From: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl>
- Re: Parallel ATA with libata status with the patches I'm working on
- From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
- Parallel ATA with libata status with the patches I'm working on
- Prev by Date: PROBLEM: potential null-pointer dereference in fs/bfs/inode.c
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 12/12: eCryptfs] Crypto functions
- Previous by thread: Re: Parallel ATA with libata status with the patches I'm working on
- Next by thread: Re: Parallel ATA with libata status with the patches I'm working on
- Index(es):
 |