Re: Parallel ATA with libata status with the patches I'm working on

Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[email protected]> writes:

> Do you think that libata is currently so much better wrt to PATA
> hot-(un)plug support?

For me? Libata works. Old IDE driver doesn't work. To be honest, haven't
checked since switched to libata, this problem might be fixed now.
-- 
Krzysztof Halasa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Parallel ATA with libata status with the patches I'm working on
    • From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Parallel ATA with libata status with the patches I'm working on
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
  • Re: Parallel ATA with libata status with the patches I'm working on
    • From: Russell King <[email protected]>
  • Re: Parallel ATA with libata status with the patches I'm working on
    • From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[email protected]>
  • Re: Parallel ATA with libata status with the patches I'm working on
    • From: Krzysztof Halasa <[email protected]>
  • Re: Parallel ATA with libata status with the patches I'm working on
    • From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: PROBLEM: potential null-pointer dereference in fs/bfs/inode.c
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 12/12: eCryptfs] Crypto functions
• Previous by thread: Re: Parallel ATA with libata status with the patches I'm working on
• Next by thread: Re: Parallel ATA with libata status with the patches I'm working on
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]