Re: Parallel ATA with libata status with the patches I'm working on

Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[email protected]> writes:

> IMO porting/rewriting host-drivers to libata now is just
> counter-productive waste of time...

That would only make sense if you consider all PATA obsolete/dead
(do you? I'm sometimes not sure).

I don't and (unable to use old IDE due to hot-plug issues) am thankful
for Alan's efforts.

Yes, I think it's similar to OSS-ALSA, WRT - you know, 6-months forward
notice etc :-)
-- 
Krzysztof Halasa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Parallel ATA with libata status with the patches I'm working on
    • From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Parallel ATA with libata status with the patches I'm working on
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
  • Re: Parallel ATA with libata status with the patches I'm working on
    • From: Russell King <[email protected]>
  • Re: Parallel ATA with libata status with the patches I'm working on
    • From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [ANNOUNCE] November Release of LTP Available
• Next by Date: Re: NTP broken with 2.6.14
• Previous by thread: Re: Parallel ATA with libata status with the patches I'm working on
• Next by thread: Re: Parallel ATA with libata status with the patches I'm working on
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]