On Tue, 1 November 2005 15:10:36 -0600, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 21:51 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Is there any reason for keeping fs/jffs2/ioctl.c?
>
> I can think of some various things that could be done with it, but that
> would require time and effort. Unless David or Thomas have an
> objections, I think it can go.
And for the last couple of years, no problem seemed urgent enough for
someone to actually implement something. I vote for removal.
Jörn
--
This above all: to thine own self be true.
-- Shakespeare
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
