Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] remove fs/jffs2/ioctl.c

On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 21:51 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Is there any reason for keeping fs/jffs2/ioctl.c?

I can think of some various things that could be done with it, but that
would require time and effort.  Unless David or Thomas have an
objections, I think it can go.

josh

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] remove fs/jffs2/ioctl.c
  - From: Jörn Engel <[email protected]>

References:
- [RFC: 2.6 patch] remove fs/jffs2/ioctl.c
  - From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/2] swsusp: reduce code duplication (was: Re: [PATCH 2/3] swsusp: move snapshot-handling functions to snapshot.c)
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/2] slob: introduce the SLOB allocator
Previous by thread: [RFC: 2.6 patch] remove fs/jffs2/ioctl.c
Next by thread: Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] remove fs/jffs2/ioctl.c
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]