Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] remove fs/jffs2/ioctl.c

On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 21:51 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Is there any reason for keeping fs/jffs2/ioctl.c?

I can think of some various things that could be done with it, but that
would require time and effort.  Unless David or Thomas have an
objections, I think it can go.

josh

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] remove fs/jffs2/ioctl.c
    • From: Jörn Engel <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [RFC: 2.6 patch] remove fs/jffs2/ioctl.c
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/2] swsusp: reduce code duplication (was: Re: [PATCH 2/3] swsusp: move snapshot-handling functions to snapshot.c)
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/2] slob: introduce the SLOB allocator
• Previous by thread: [RFC: 2.6 patch] remove fs/jffs2/ioctl.c
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] remove fs/jffs2/ioctl.c
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]