Andi Kleen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Sunday 30 October 2005 20:12, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > The freezes are for fixing bugs, especially recent regressions. There's no
> > shortage of them, you know.
> >
> > I you can think of a better way to get kernel developers off their butts
> > and actually fixing bugs, I'm all ears.
>
> The problem is that you usually cannot do proper bug fixing because
> the release might be just around the corner, so you typically
> chose the ugly workaround or revert, or just reject changes for bugs that a
> are too risky or the impact too low because there is not enough time to
> properly test anymore.
There is absolutely nothing preventing people from working on bugs at any
time! It's not as if a bugfix can ever come too early.
> It might work better if we were told when the releases would actually
> happen and you don't need to fear that this not quite tested everywhere
> bugfix you're about to submit might make it into the gold kernel, breaking
> the world for some subset of users.
Nobody knows when a kernel will be released, because it's released
according to perceived bug status, not according to a preconceived
timeline.
I just don't buy what you're saying. Unless the kernel is at -rc3 or -rc4,
we *know* the release is weeks away - it's always been thus.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
