Russell King <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 12:29:28AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> writes:
> > > I don't think anybody has been really unhappy with this approach? Hmm?
> >
> > The long freeze periods were nothing much happens are painful. It
> > would be better to have some more overlap of merging and stabilizing
> > (stable does that already kind of, but not enough)
>
> Violently agree. I find the long freeze periods painful and very very
> very boring, to the point of looking for other stuff to do (such as
> cleaning up bits of the kernel and queuing mega-patches for the next
> round of merging.)
The freezes are for fixing bugs, especially recent regressions. There's no
shortage of them, you know.
I you can think of a better way to get kernel developers off their butts
and actually fixing bugs, I'm all ears.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
