Russell King <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 11:12:41AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Russell King <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 12:29:28AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > > Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> writes:
> > > > > I don't think anybody has been really unhappy with this approach? Hmm?
> > > >
> > > > The long freeze periods were nothing much happens are painful. It
> > > > would be better to have some more overlap of merging and stabilizing
> > > > (stable does that already kind of, but not enough)
> > >
> > > Violently agree. I find the long freeze periods painful and very very
> > > very boring, to the point of looking for other stuff to do (such as
> > > cleaning up bits of the kernel and queuing mega-patches for the next
> > > round of merging.)
> >
> > The freezes are for fixing bugs, especially recent regressions.
>
> Given my stated low activity during the -rc periods, well, you draw
> your conclusion from that.
>
> > There's no shortage of them, you know.
>
> Please let me know when there's something in my area regresses.
>
a) you're sitting around feeling very very very bored while
b) the kernel is in long freeze due to the lack of kernel developer
attention to known bugs
The solution seems fairly obvious to me?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
