Re: [git patches] 2.6.x libata updates

[Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>]

Hi!

> > Even so, it's easy, to I'll ask him to test 2.6.14, 2.6.14-git1, and
> > (tonight's upcoming) 2.6.14-git2 (with my latest pull included) to see if
> > anything breaks.
> 
> Side note: one of the downsides of the new "merge lots of stuff early in 
> the development series" approach is that the first few daily snapshots end 
> up being _huge_. 
> 
> So the -git1 and -git2 patches are/will be very big indeed.
> 
> For example, patch-2.6.14-git1 literally ended up being a megabyte 
> compressed. Right now my diff to 2.6.14 (after just two days) is 1.6MB 
> compressed.
...
> Now, I've gotten several positive comments on how easy "git bisect" is to 
> use, and I've used it myself, but this is the first time that patch users 
> _really_ become very much second-class citizens, and you can't necessarily 
> always do useful things with just the tar-trees and patches. That's sad, 
> and possibly a really big downside.
> 
> Don't get me wrong - I personally think that the new merge policy is a 
> clear improvement, but it does have this downside.

Well, git bisect helps a bit, but does not really cut it. If changes are
merged slowly enough, you usually don't need to go through history;
you know it is broken, you know it worked yesterday, and diff is small enough...

				Pavel
-- 
64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=28 ttl=51 time=448769.1 ms         

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/