--- Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 12:42:27PM +0200, Stefan Richter wrote:
> > A. Post mock-ups and pseudo code about how to change the core, discuss.
> > B. Set up a scsi-cleanup tree. In this tree,
> > 1. renovate the core (thereby break all command set drivers and
> > all transport subsystems),
>
> No way. Doing things from scatch is a really bad idea. See how far we came
> with Linux 2.6 scsi vs 2.4 scsi without throwing everything away and break
> the
> world. Please submit changes to fix _one_ thing at a time and fix all users.
> Repeat until done or you don't care anymore.
No offence Christoph, but who are you again?
There is a clear reason why you among others do not want new architecture.
And that reason is (people) obsoletion.
Such political stance cannot go on forever -- just look at History.
Sooner or later things change and they change radically. The question
is How prepared are you/we to cope with this (inevitable) change?
Either way, obsoletion or adoption -- think about it, it doesn't only apply
to computer and OS design, it applies to everything.
Luben
--
http://linux.adaptec.com/sas/
http://www.adaptec.com/sas/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
