Re: ioctls, etc. (was Re: [PATCH 1/4] sas: add flag for locally attached PHYs)

On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 12:42:27PM +0200, Stefan Richter wrote:
> A. Post mock-ups and pseudo code about how to change the core, discuss.
> B. Set up a scsi-cleanup tree. In this tree,
>      1. renovate the core (thereby break all command set drivers and
>         all transport subsystems),

No way.  Doing things from scatch is a really bad idea.  See how far we came
with Linux 2.6 scsi vs 2.4 scsi without throwing everything away and break the
world.  Please submit changes to fix _one_ thing at a time and fix all users.
Repeat until done or you don't care anymore.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: ioctls, etc. (was Re: [PATCH 1/4] sas: add flag for locally attached PHYs)
    • From: Stefan Richter <[email protected]>
  • Re: ioctls, etc. (was Re: [PATCH 1/4] sas: add flag for locally attached PHYs)
    • From: Luben Tuikov <[email protected]>
  • Re: ioctls, etc. (was Re: [PATCH 1/4] sas: add flag for locally attached PHYs)
    • From: Sergey Panov <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: ioctls, etc. (was Re: [PATCH 1/4] sas: add flag for locally attached PHYs)
    • From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
  • Re: ioctls, etc. (was Re: [PATCH 1/4] sas: add flag for locally attached PHYs)
    • From: Luben Tuikov <[email protected]>
  • Re: ioctls, etc. (was Re: [PATCH 1/4] sas: add flag for locally attached PHYs)
    • From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
  • Re: ioctls, etc. (was Re: [PATCH 1/4] sas: add flag for locally attached PHYs)
    • From: Luben Tuikov <[email protected]>
  • Re: ioctls, etc. (was Re: [PATCH 1/4] sas: add flag for locally attached PHYs)
    • From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
  • Re: ioctls, etc. (was Re: [PATCH 1/4] sas: add flag for locally attached PHYs)
    • From: Luben Tuikov <[email protected]>
  • Re: ioctls, etc. (was Re: [PATCH 1/4] sas: add flag for locally attached PHYs)
    • From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
  • Re: ioctls, etc. (was Re: [PATCH 1/4] sas: add flag for locally attached PHYs)
    • From: Luben Tuikov <[email protected]>
  • Re: ioctls, etc. (was Re: [PATCH 1/4] sas: add flag for locally attached PHYs)
    • From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
  • Re: ioctls, etc. (was Re: [PATCH 1/4] sas: add flag for locally attached PHYs)
    • From: Stefan Richter <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [EXPERIMENT,RFC] FAT: Add "flush" option for hotplug devices
• Next by Date: Re: [EXPERIMENT,RFC] FAT: Add "flush" option for hotplug devices
• Previous by thread: Re: ioctls, etc. (was Re: [PATCH 1/4] sas: add flag for locally attached PHYs)
• Next by thread: Re: ioctls, etc. (was Re: [PATCH 1/4] sas: add flag for locally attached PHYs)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]