Re: [ACPI] Re: [Pcihpd-discuss] RE: [patch 2/2] acpi: add ability to derive irq when doing a surpriseremoval of an adapter

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>  	pci_read_config_byte(dev, PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN, &pin);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * If a device has been "surprise" removed via
> +	 * hotplug, the pin value will be invalid
> +	 * In this case, we should use the stored
> +	 * pin value from the pci_dev structure
> +	 */
> +	if (pin == 0xff)
> +		pin = dev->pin;

I think you should just always use dev->pin, and don't even
bother trying the pci_read_config_byte().  Fewer code paths
to worry about that way.

Bjorn

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux