On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 09:51:51AM -0700, Kristen Accardi wrote: > This seems like a good idea to me, if nobody objects to adding another > field to pci_dev, I can change the patch to do this and resubmit. If you squeeze it in after rom_base_reg, it won't even take any more space. Assuming you'll be using a u8 for it, that is. (We only really need three bits, right? 0-4) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- RE: [patch 2/2] acpi: add ability to derive irq when doing a surpriseremoval of an adapter
- From: "Li, Shaohua" <[email protected]>
- RE: [patch 2/2] acpi: add ability to derive irq when doing a surpriseremoval of an adapter
- From: Kristen Accardi <[email protected]>
- Re: [Pcihpd-discuss] RE: [patch 2/2] acpi: add ability to derive irq when doing a surpriseremoval of an adapter
- From: Kristen Accardi <[email protected]>
- Re: [ACPI] Re: [Pcihpd-discuss] RE: [patch 2/2] acpi: add ability to derive irq when doing a surpriseremoval of an adapter
- From: Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]>
- Re: [ACPI] Re: [Pcihpd-discuss] RE: [patch 2/2] acpi: add ability to derive irq when doing a surpriseremoval of an adapter
- From: Kristen Accardi <[email protected]>
- RE: [patch 2/2] acpi: add ability to derive irq when doing a surpriseremoval of an adapter
- Prev by Date: [PATCH] ppc32: ppc_sys fixes for 8xx and 82xx
- Next by Date: Reiser4 lockups (no oops)
- Previous by thread: Re: [ACPI] Re: [Pcihpd-discuss] RE: [patch 2/2] acpi: add ability to derive irq when doing a surpriseremoval of an adapter
- Next by thread: [PATCH 2/2] V4L: Enable s-video input on DViCO FusionHDTV5 Lite
- Index(es):
 |