Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
How about this ?
+cpuset_update_task_mems_allowed(task, new); (this isn't implemented
now
*new* is already guaranteed to be the subset of current mem_allowed.
Is this violate the permission ?
Could the cpuset_mems_allowed(task) function update the mems_allowed if
needed?
It looks I was wrong :(
see Paul's e-mail. he describes the problem of my suggestion in detail.
-- Kame
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
