On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > > > How about this ? > > > +cpuset_update_task_mems_allowed(task, new); (this isn't implemented > > > now > > *new* is already guaranteed to be the subset of current mem_allowed. > Is this violate the permission ? Could the cpuset_mems_allowed(task) function update the mems_allowed if needed? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 4/4] Swap migration V3: sys_migrate_pages interface
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 4/4] Swap migration V3: sys_migrate_pages interface
- From: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 4/4] Swap migration V3: sys_migrate_pages interface
- References:
- [PATCH 0/4] Swap migration V3: Overview
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 4/4] Swap migration V3: sys_migrate_pages interface
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 4/4] Swap migration V3: sys_migrate_pages interface
- From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 4/4] Swap migration V3: sys_migrate_pages interface
- From: Simon Derr <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 4/4] Swap migration V3: sys_migrate_pages interface
- From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 0/4] Swap migration V3: Overview
- Prev by Date: Re: Understanding Linux addr space, malloc, and heap
- Next by Date: -rc5-rt3 - IRQoff tracing numbers still reflect timer? (AMD64?)
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 4/4] Swap migration V3: sys_migrate_pages interface
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 4/4] Swap migration V3: sys_migrate_pages interface
- Index(es):
 |