Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken

On Tue, 2005-10-18 at 16:22 -0700, Ravikiran G Thirumalai wrote:

> Hope the following works.   Using __alloc_bootmem_node now with a hard coded
> goal to avoid 16MB DMA zone.  It is ugly :( and hope it works this time
> <fingers crossed>. 

   Nope, it still gives me memory above 4GB.  If I change goal to 0x0 it
works.  One nit, shouldn't IS_LOW_AGES() be more like this:

#define IS_LOWPAGES(paddr, size) ((paddr+size-1) < 0x100000000UL)

Minor optimization not checking the start, but a 64MB swiotlb starting
at 4GB-64MB should be found as ok.  Thanks,

	Alex

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken
  - From: Yasunori Goto <[email protected]>
- Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken
  - From: Alex Williamson <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken
  - From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken
  - From: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <[email protected]>
- Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken
  - From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken
  - From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken
  - From: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <[email protected]>
- Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken
  - From: Alex Williamson <[email protected]>
- Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken
  - From: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <[email protected]>
- Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken
  - From: Alex Williamson <[email protected]>
- Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken
  - From: Alex Williamson <[email protected]>
- Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken
  - From: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] fix nr_unused accounting, and avoid recursing in iput with I_WILL_FREE set
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] ktimers subsystem 2.6.14-rc2-kt5
Previous by thread: Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken
Next by thread: Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]