On Tue, 18 Oct 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > I vote for this one, assuming everybody who can test is happy. Of course, just after sending the patch I noticed that there was a new version, even simpler. Can people test that one? Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken
- From: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <[email protected]>
- Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken
- References:
- x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken
- From: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <[email protected]>
- Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken
- From: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <[email protected]>
- Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken
- From: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <[email protected]>
- Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken
- Prev by Date: Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken
- Next by Date: Re: VFS: file-max limit 50044 reached
- Previous by thread: Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken
- Next by thread: Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken
- Index(es):
 |