Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken

On Tue, 18 Oct 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> I vote for this one, assuming everybody who can test is happy.

Of course, just after sending the patch I noticed that there was a new 
version, even simpler. Can people test that one?

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken
    • From: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <[email protected]>

• References:
  • x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken
    • From: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <[email protected]>
  • Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken
    • From: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <[email protected]>
  • Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken
    • From: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <[email protected]>
  • Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken
• Next by Date: Re: VFS: file-max limit 50044 reached
• Previous by thread: Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken
• Next by thread: Re: [discuss] Re: x86_64: 2.6.14-rc4 swiotlb broken
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]