Re: [PATCH] X25: Add ITU-T facilites

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Em Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 03:23:18PM +0900, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ?$B5HF#1QL@ escreveu:
> In article <[email protected]> (at Tue, 18 Oct 2005 16:09:27 +1000), Andrew Hendry <[email protected]> says:
> 
> > +/* 
> > +*     ITU DTE facilities
> > +*     Only the called and calling address
> > +*     extension are currently implemented.
> > +*     The rest are in place to avoid the struct
> > +*     changing size if someone needs them later
> > ++ */
> > +struct x25_dte_facilities {
> > +	unsigned int    calling_len, called_len;
> > +	char            calling_ae[20];
> > +	char            called_ae[20];
> > +	unsigned char   min_throughput;
> > +	unsigned short  delay_cumul;
> > +	unsigned short  delay_target;
> > +	unsigned short  delay_max;
> > +	unsigned char   expedited;
> > +};
> 
> Why don't you use fixed size members?
> And we can eliminate 8bit hole.
> 
> struct x25_dte_facilities {
>      u32             calling_len
>      u32             called_len;

I guess the two above can be 'u8' as they refer to calling_ae and called_ae
that at most will be '20'?

>      u8              calling_ae[20];
>      u8              called_ae[20];

- Arnaldo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux