Em Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 03:23:18PM +0900, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ?$B5HF#1QL@ escreveu:
> In article <[email protected]> (at Tue, 18 Oct 2005 16:09:27 +1000), Andrew Hendry <[email protected]> says:
>
> > +/*
> > +* ITU DTE facilities
> > +* Only the called and calling address
> > +* extension are currently implemented.
> > +* The rest are in place to avoid the struct
> > +* changing size if someone needs them later
> > ++ */
> > +struct x25_dte_facilities {
> > + unsigned int calling_len, called_len;
> > + char calling_ae[20];
> > + char called_ae[20];
> > + unsigned char min_throughput;
> > + unsigned short delay_cumul;
> > + unsigned short delay_target;
> > + unsigned short delay_max;
> > + unsigned char expedited;
> > +};
>
> Why don't you use fixed size members?
> And we can eliminate 8bit hole.
>
> struct x25_dte_facilities {
> u32 calling_len
> u32 called_len;
I guess the two above can be 'u8' as they refer to calling_ae and called_ae
that at most will be '20'?
> u8 calling_ae[20];
> u8 called_ae[20];
- Arnaldo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
