Greetings,
The following trivial patch is to fix what looks like a typo in the PXA register
definitions. The correction comes directly from the definition in the
Intel Documentation.
http://www.intel.com/design/pca/applicationsprocessors/manuals/278693.htm
Intel(R) PXA 255 Processor - Developers Manual - Jan 2004 - Page 12-33
Neither 'UDCCS_IO_ROF' or 'UDCCS_IO_DME' are currently used elseware
in the main code (from grep of tree)... The current definitions have been
in the code since at lease 2.4.7.
Paul Schulz <[email protected]>
---
diff -Nuar linux-2.6.13.orig/include/asm-arm/arch-pxa/pxa-regs.h
linux-2.6.13/include/asm-arm/arch-pxa/pxa-regs.h
--- linux-2.6.13.orig/include/asm-arm/arch-pxa/pxa-regs.h
2005-08-31 11:40:22.000000000 +0930
+++ linux-2.6.13/include/asm-arm/arch-pxa/pxa-regs.h 2005-10-13
15:04:52.141864488 +0930
@@ -652,7 +652,7 @@
#define UDCCS_IO_RFS (1 << 0) /* Receive FIFO service */
#define UDCCS_IO_RPC (1 << 1) /* Receive packet complete */
-#define UDCCS_IO_ROF (1 << 3) /* Receive overflow */
+#define UDCCS_IO_ROF (1 << 2) /* Receive overflow */
#define UDCCS_IO_DME (1 << 3) /* DMA enable */
#define UDCCS_IO_RNE (1 << 6) /* Receive FIFO not empty */
#define UDCCS_IO_RSP (1 << 7) /* Receive short packet */
Signed-off-by: Paul Schulz <[email protected]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
