[PATCH 2.6.13] pxa-regs: Typo in ARM pxa register definitions.

[Paul Schulz <pschulz01@gmail.com>]

Greetings,
The following trivial patch is to fix what looks like a typo in the PXA register
definitions. The correction comes directly from the definition in the
Intel Documentation.

   http://www.intel.com/design/pca/applicationsprocessors/manuals/278693.htm
   Intel(R) PXA 255 Processor - Developers Manual - Jan 2004 - Page 12-33

Neither 'UDCCS_IO_ROF' or 'UDCCS_IO_DME' are currently used elseware
in the main code (from grep of tree)... The current definitions have been
in the code since at lease 2.4.7.

 Paul Schulz  <paul@mawsonlakes.org>
 ---
 diff -Nuar linux-2.6.13.orig/include/asm-arm/arch-pxa/pxa-regs.h
linux-2.6.13/include/asm-arm/arch-pxa/pxa-regs.h
 --- linux-2.6.13.orig/include/asm-arm/arch-pxa/pxa-regs.h      
2005-08-31 11:40:22.000000000 +0930
 +++ linux-2.6.13/include/asm-arm/arch-pxa/pxa-regs.h    2005-10-13
15:04:52.141864488 +0930
 @@ -652,7 +652,7 @@

  #define UDCCS_IO_RFS   (1 << 0)        /* Receive FIFO service */
  #define UDCCS_IO_RPC   (1 << 1)        /* Receive packet complete */
 -#define UDCCS_IO_ROF   (1 << 3)        /* Receive overflow */
 +#define UDCCS_IO_ROF   (1 << 2)        /* Receive overflow */
  #define UDCCS_IO_DME   (1 << 3)        /* DMA enable */
  #define UDCCS_IO_RNE   (1 << 6)        /* Receive FIFO not empty */
  #define UDCCS_IO_RSP   (1 << 7)        /* Receive short packet */


Signed-off-by: Paul Schulz <paul@mawsonlakes.org>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/