* Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > [...] It will waste my time, I could spend on other projects and it
> > > will put Andrew in the unfortunate position to decide, which patch to
> > > accept. [...]
> >
> > yes, please, put Andrew (and me too) into that unfortunate position!
> > Please, pretty please, get on with the patches!
>
> I'm with Roman on this one - the old "show me the code" trick which
> people use to quash other people's objections is rather poor form - we
> should simply address the objections as raised.
>
> That being said, I'll confess that I've largely ignored this
> discussion in the hope that things would get sorted out. Seems that
> this won't be happening and as Roman's opinions carry weight I do
> intend to solicit a (brief!) summary of his objections from him when
> the patch comes round again. Sorry.
Fine with me. A brief summary of technical objections (without any
personal attacks) is all we wanted to have to begin with. "Show me the
code" was my last-ditch attempt to move this seemingly unmovable
discussion from a communication channel where the chemistry doesnt seem
to work out to a more objective format.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
