* Roman Zippel <[email protected]> wrote:
> > the moment you express yourself via patches we'll know that 1) you
> > understand what we have done so far 2) you have useful ideas of what
> > should be done differently 3) you have the coder capability to implement
> > and test those ideas. Patches wont be ignored, i can assure you. Get the
> > patches rolling!
>
> This "shut up and show code" attitude is sometimes quite funny, but
> it's no real threat to me. I hoped to avoid this and solve this more
> civilized. Of course I'll understand the issues better afterwards, but
> you could as easily just tell me. [...]
if a dozen mails werent enough then one more probably wont make a
difference, especially with your last mail calling Thomas's behavior
"childish" - when all he did was to try to explain his reasons to you as
patiently as possible! Thomas is not obliged to teach you or bear with
you - it is his own free choice. (But if you want to discuss this
personal angle any further please take the public lists (and other
people) off the Cc: list, it's getting very off-topic.)
Thomas's stuff is now fully integrated into the -rt tree and it works
excellently. I have measured a 12 usecs worst-case HR timer-delivery
latency (using cyclictest). _That_ is the thing i care about.
> [...] It will waste my time, I could spend on other projects and it
> will put Andrew in the unfortunate position to decide, which patch to
> accept. [...]
yes, please, put Andrew (and me too) into that unfortunate position!
Please, pretty please, get on with the patches!
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
