Re: [PATCH] ktimers subsystem 2.6.14-rc2-kt5

[Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>]

* Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org> wrote:

> > the moment you express yourself via patches we'll know that 1) you 
> > understand what we have done so far 2) you have useful ideas of what 
> > should be done differently 3) you have the coder capability to implement 
> > and test those ideas. Patches wont be ignored, i can assure you. Get the 
> > patches rolling!
> 
> This "shut up and show code" attitude is sometimes quite funny, but 
> it's no real threat to me. I hoped to avoid this and solve this more 
> civilized. Of course I'll understand the issues better afterwards, but 
> you could as easily just tell me. [...]

if a dozen mails werent enough then one more probably wont make a 
difference, especially with your last mail calling Thomas's behavior 
"childish" - when all he did was to try to explain his reasons to you as 
patiently as possible! Thomas is not obliged to teach you or bear with 
you - it is his own free choice. (But if you want to discuss this 
personal angle any further please take the public lists (and other 
people) off the Cc: list, it's getting very off-topic.)

Thomas's stuff is now fully integrated into the -rt tree and it works 
excellently. I have measured a 12 usecs worst-case HR timer-delivery 
latency (using cyclictest). _That_ is the thing i care about.

> [...] It will waste my time, I could spend on other projects and it 
> will put Andrew in the unfortunate position to decide, which patch to 
> accept. [...]

yes, please, put Andrew (and me too) into that unfortunate position!  
Please, pretty please, get on with the patches!

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/