RE: [BUG?] 2.6.x (2.6.13) - new signals not being delivered to a terminating (PF_EXITING) process.

On Maw, 2005-10-11 at 14:35 -0500, Kilau, Scott wrote:
> Also, why did this work under 2.4?
> 
> This is why I was wondering if this was intentional, or was just an
> oversight...

It seems that the signal reception in exiting process logic has changed.
Serial depends on the old behaviour and its difficult to see how it
should be fixed and what else would be "correct behaviour" here.

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • RE: [BUG?] 2.6.x (2.6.13) - new signals not being delivered to a terminating (PF_EXITING) process.
    • From: "Kilau, Scott" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] ppc64: Thermal control for SMU based machines
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] ppc64: Thermal control for SMU based machines
• Previous by thread: RE: [BUG?] 2.6.x (2.6.13) - new signals not being delivered to a terminating (PF_EXITING) process.
• Next by thread: RE: [BUG?] 2.6.x (2.6.13) - new signals not being delivered to a terminating (PF_EXITING) process.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]