RE: [BUG?] 2.6.x (2.6.13) - new signals not being delivered to a terminating (PF_EXITING) process.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> Once a process in in the 'Z' state it should not receive any
> signals. Its signal handlers are already gone. It's just a
> snippit of sys_exit code that remains. If the process truly
> is in the 'Z' state, its input/output/error file-descriptors
> should have already been closed so the time-out from the
> shutdown should have already happened.

Hi Dick,

You are right, its not a zombie.

The process is held up in "drain" in the tty close of the
processes stdin (/dev/ttyS0).
(I assumed brackets in ps -ef meant zombies, but that's wrong)

I added some code to make a short timeout in the "tty close" part of
the driver, then check the values of:

current->signal->shared_pending.list.next
current->signal->shared_pending.list.prev

They *do* change, when I send the process (date) a signal.

The kernel just isn't waking up the driver's "wait" to let it
know that there are signals pending.

Also, why did this work under 2.4?

This is why I was wondering if this was intentional, or was just an
oversight...

Thanks!
Scott
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux