Alon Bar-Lev <[email protected]> writes: > > +config COMMAND_LINE_MAX_SIZE > + int "Maximum kernel command-line size" > + default 512 > + help > + This option allows you to specify maximum kernel command-line > + for kernel to handle. I think making that a config is a really bad idea. What happens when the user specifies a very large value. Or a very small one? There are subtle dependencies with the boot loader, so this is mostly a lie anyways. And it doesn't really safe enough memory to bother with a CONFIG. Also the last time I tried to increase this all kind of systems with old bootloaders exploded (e.g. lilo on systems with large EDID information - search the archives). Have these issues been resolved now? If yes then I would suggest to just double the default. If not it cannot be changed anyways. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] 2.6.14-rc3 x86: COMMAND_LINE_SIZE
- From: Alon Bar-Lev <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] 2.6.14-rc3 x86: COMMAND_LINE_SIZE
- References:
- Re: THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit
- From: Georg Lippold <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] Re: THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit
- From: Georg Lippold <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Re: THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit
- From: Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Re: THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Re: THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit
- From: Georg Lippold <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Re: THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 1/1] 2.6.14-rc3 x86: COMMAND_LINE_SIZE
- From: Georg Lippold <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] 2.6.14-rc3 x86: COMMAND_LINE_SIZE
- From: Alon Bar-Lev <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] 2.6.14-rc3 x86: COMMAND_LINE_SIZE
- From: Georg Lippold <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] 2.6.14-rc3 x86: COMMAND_LINE_SIZE
- From: Alon Bar-Lev <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] 2.6.14-rc3 x86: COMMAND_LINE_SIZE
- From: Georg Lippold <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] 2.6.14-rc3 x86: COMMAND_LINE_SIZE
- From: Alon Bar-Lev <[email protected]>
- Re: THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit
- Prev by Date: [PATCH 3/3] hugetlb: Simple overcommit check
- Next by Date: Re: "sync" option with usb storage makes it real slow since 2.6.13
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/1] 2.6.14-rc3 x86: COMMAND_LINE_SIZE
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/1] 2.6.14-rc3 x86: COMMAND_LINE_SIZE
- Index(es):