Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > But the address of cmd_line_ptr is defined to be from the end of the > setup to 0xa0000. This is well defined, since the boot loader will > load the kernel, initramfs and cmd_line_ptr to the correct place... > Nothing is overwritten... Then the kernel is up and takes as much as > it needs from cmd_line_ptr. OK, then: Update my patch if you want to and resubmit it. I would like to get this through as quickly as possible. Greetings, Georg - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] 2.6.14-rc3 x86: COMMAND_LINE_SIZE
- From: Alon Bar-Lev <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] 2.6.14-rc3 x86: COMMAND_LINE_SIZE
- References:
- Re: THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit
- From: Georg Lippold <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] Re: THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit
- From: Georg Lippold <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Re: THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit
- From: Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Re: THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Re: THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit
- From: Georg Lippold <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Re: THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 1/1] 2.6.14-rc3 x86: COMMAND_LINE_SIZE
- From: Georg Lippold <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] 2.6.14-rc3 x86: COMMAND_LINE_SIZE
- From: Alon Bar-Lev <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] 2.6.14-rc3 x86: COMMAND_LINE_SIZE
- From: Georg Lippold <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] 2.6.14-rc3 x86: COMMAND_LINE_SIZE
- From: Alon Bar-Lev <[email protected]>
- Re: THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] i386 spinlocks should use the full 32 bits, not only 8 bits
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] i386 spinlocks should use the full 32 bits, not only 8 bits
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/1] 2.6.14-rc3 x86: COMMAND_LINE_SIZE
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/1] 2.6.14-rc3 x86: COMMAND_LINE_SIZE
- Index(es):
 |