On Sun, 2 Oct 2005, Peter Osterlund wrote:
> OK, in that case this patch for 2.6.12 should work as well, because
> all it does compared to the previous patch is to remove the now unused
> high_prio_read variables. Can you confirm that it works?
Yes, it does.
> With that patch for 2.6.12, the diff compared to 2.6.13 now looks like
> below. Can you confirm that reverse applying this patch for 2.6.13
> also works?
Well, I am testing always with 2.6.13 kernel, just replacing the pktcdvd
driver sources. So, I just checked that 2.6.13 - your 2nd patch from the
last email == 2.6.12 + 1st patch from the same email ( + trivial
refrigerator() call compile-fix), so, we may save us this test.
Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
