On Sun, 09 Oct 2005 15:44:38 +0800, Coywolf Qi Hunt said: > On 10/9/05, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > It is "security stable". Let's take this new notation from now on. > "Security Stable" doesn't have to be all security related. Tell you what - you convince the -stable team, and I'll go along with it.. > (you want [email protected] to replace [email protected] too?) You're the one who called it "security stable" ;) > What you did is so stupid to me to to use -R every time. -R implies > something wrong, and need to revert. Umm... my diff had *lower case* -r (recursive), not -R (revert)...
Attachment:
pgpbNqrOmCdZp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: "stable" vs "security stable"
- From: Coywolf Qi Hunt <[email protected]>
- Re: "stable" vs "security stable"
- References:
- "stable" vs "security stable"
- From: Coywolf Qi Hunt <[email protected]>
- Re: "stable" vs "security stable"
- From: [email protected]
- Re: "stable" vs "security stable"
- From: Coywolf Qi Hunt <[email protected]>
- "stable" vs "security stable"
- Prev by Date: Re: [Security] "stable" vs "security stable"
- Next by Date: Re: [patch 3/4] new serial flow control
- Previous by thread: Re: "stable" vs "security stable"
- Next by thread: Re: "stable" vs "security stable"
- Index(es):
 |