Re: "stable" vs "security stable"

[Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu]

On Sun, 09 Oct 2005 14:07:19 +0800, Coywolf Qi Hunt said:
> Hello,
> 
> I find the kernel.org first page inconvenient for some people somehow
> since the security stable came.

Unfortunately, it's a "stable", not "security stable" release.  Although
a large proportion of the fixes are security-related, the aren't *all*
security - there's also the occasional brown-bag bug or unexpected side
effect that simply causes incorrect operation of the kernel.

Having said that, Coywolf *is* right in that it's a bit unclear that
you have to fetch the 'F'(ull) 2.6.13.3, then get the patch, put that
on with patch -R to get a 2.6.13 tree, and then apply the 2.6.14-rc3 patch.
(Although if you realize that 14-rc3 is diffed off 13.0, not 13.3, it's not
that bad at all)...

I admit being torn between encouraging more people to try -rc kernels, and
wanting to enforce a minimum clue level on those trying to do so....

Hmm.. what if we did something like this:

diff -rup linux-2.6.13/dot.release linux-2.6.13.3/dot.release
--- linux-2.6.13/dot.release    2005-10-09 03:09:54.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.13.3/dot.release  2005-10-09 03:12:02.000000000 -0400
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
-This is a base release 2.6.13.  Stable patches, 2.6.14-rc patches,
-and the final 2.6.14 patch should be applied to this.
+This is a dot release. You need to patch -R the .3 patch before
+attempting to apply a .14-rc or .14 patch.

And then build the 14-rc3 patch:

diff -rup linux-2.6.13/dot.release linux-2.6.14-rc3/dot.release
--- linux-2.6.13/dot.release    2005-10-09 03:09:54.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.14-rc3/dot.release        2005-10-09 03:03:40.000000000 -0400
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
-This is a base release 2.6.13.  Stable patches, 2.6.14-rc patches,
-and the final 2.6.14 patch should be applied to this.
+This is a 14-rc3 release.  The patch will bomb out if you try
+to apply it to anything other than a 2.6.13.0 tree.  Did you
+remember to 'patch -R' any 2.6.13.N 'stable' patch first?

Now if we arrange for that to be the first diff in the patchfile, and
they get it wrong, they'll see:

% patch -p1 < 2.6.14-rc3.patch 
patching file dot.release
Hunk #1 FAILED at 1.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file dot.release.rej
% cat dot.release.rej 
***************
*** 1,2 ****
- This is a base release 2.6.13.  Stable patches, 2.6.14-rc patches,
- and the final 2.6.14 patch should be applied to this.
--- 1,3 ----
+ This is a 14-rc3 release.  The patch will bomb out if you try
+ to apply it to anything other than a 2.6.13.0 tree.  Did you
+ remember to 'patch -R' any 2.6.13.N 'stable' patch first?

(OK, it's a silly 3AM idea. ;)

Attachment: pgpbmZY8XOFub.pgp
Description: PGP signature