Re: [PATCH] gfp flags annotations - part 1

On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 12:04:46PM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> zfcp_mempool_alloc needs to fit the prototype of mempool_alloc_t.
> If you have a better idea to implement a mempool, please let us
> know. The calls you mention are actually calls to mempool_create
> and not to zfcp_mempool_alloc, or are you talking about
> something different?

Ouch. I'll shut up now.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCHSET] 2.6.14-rc3-git4-bird1
    • From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCHSET] 2.6.14-rc3-git4-bird1
    • From: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
  • [RFC] gfp flags annotations
    • From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC] gfp flags annotations
    • From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] gfp flags annotations - part 1
    • From: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] gfp flags annotations - part 1
    • From: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [RFC] Hard disk protection revisited
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] vm - swap_prefetch-15
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] gfp flags annotations - part 1
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC] gfp flags annotations
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]