On Thu, 6 Oct 2005, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > rik, alan, i replied privately seeking your input on a post i was > developing in reply to your earlier comments > "PLEASE REVIEW" as part of the subject. I've got better things to do than saving you from yourself. I replied to your original email in an attempt to educate some of the other readers on the linux-kernel mailing list. Private email does not have this same benefit, so there was no reason for me to reply. -- All Rights Reversed - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: what's next for the linux kernel?
- From: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <[email protected]>
- Re: what's next for the linux kernel?
- References:
- what's next for the linux kernel?
- From: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <[email protected]>
- Re: what's next for the linux kernel?
- From: "Martin J. Bligh" <[email protected]>
- Re: what's next for the linux kernel?
- From: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <[email protected]>
- Re: what's next for the linux kernel?
- From: Chase Venters <[email protected]>
- Re: what's next for the linux kernel?
- From: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <[email protected]>
- Re: what's next for the linux kernel?
- From: Nikita Danilov <[email protected]>
- Re: what's next for the linux kernel?
- From: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <[email protected]>
- Re: what's next for the linux kernel?
- From: Rik van Riel <[email protected]>
- Re: what's next for the linux kernel?
- From: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <[email protected]>
- what's next for the linux kernel?
- Prev by Date: 2.6.14-rc3-rt10 build problem
- Next by Date: Debug: sleeping function called from invalid context at include/linux/rwsem.h:66
- Previous by thread: Re: what's next for the linux kernel?
- Next by thread: Re: what's next for the linux kernel?
- Index(es):
 |