On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 08:27:45PM -0500, Chase Venters wrote:
> The bottom line is that the application developers need to start being clever
> with threads.
yep! ah. but. see this:
http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2004-December/038300.html
and think what would happen if glibc had hardware-support for
semaphores and mutexes.
> I think I remember some interesting rumors about Perl 6, for
> example, including 'autothreading' support - the idea that your optimizer
> could be smart enough to identify certain work that can go parallel.
http://www.ics.ele.tue.nl/~sander/publications.php
http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=582068
http://csdl.computer.org/comp/proceedings/acsd/2003/1887/00/18870237.pdf
to get the above references, put in "holland parallel code
analysis tools" into google.com.
put in "parallel code analysis tools" into google.com for a different
set.
l.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
