Re: what's next for the linux kernel?

Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton writes:

[...]

 >  the bastion sftp example i gave which required selinux on top of a much
 >  broader set of POSIX file permissions demonstrates the fallacy of your
 >  statement.

Still waiting you to express 0656 with well-formed NT ACLs.

Nikita.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • what's next for the linux kernel?
    • From: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <[email protected]>
  • Re: what's next for the linux kernel?
    • From: Marc Perkel <[email protected]>
  • Re: what's next for the linux kernel?
    • From: Rik van Riel <[email protected]>
  • Re: what's next for the linux kernel?
    • From: Marc Perkel <[email protected]>
  • Re: what's next for the linux kernel?
    • From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
  • Re: what's next for the linux kernel?
    • From: Marc Perkel <[email protected]>
  • Re: what's next for the linux kernel?
    • From: [email protected] (Lennart Sorensen)
  • Re: what's next for the linux kernel?
    • From: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Free swap suspend from dependency on PageReserved
• Next by Date: Re: [Keyrings] [PATCH] Keys: Add LSM hooks for key management
• Previous by thread: Re: what's next for the linux kernel?
• Next by thread: Re: what's next for the linux kernel?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]