Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton writes: [...] > the bastion sftp example i gave which required selinux on top of a much > broader set of POSIX file permissions demonstrates the fallacy of your > statement. Still waiting you to express 0656 with well-formed NT ACLs. Nikita. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- what's next for the linux kernel?
- From: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <[email protected]>
- Re: what's next for the linux kernel?
- From: Marc Perkel <[email protected]>
- Re: what's next for the linux kernel?
- From: Rik van Riel <[email protected]>
- Re: what's next for the linux kernel?
- From: Marc Perkel <[email protected]>
- Re: what's next for the linux kernel?
- From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
- Re: what's next for the linux kernel?
- From: Marc Perkel <[email protected]>
- Re: what's next for the linux kernel?
- From: [email protected] (Lennart Sorensen)
- Re: what's next for the linux kernel?
- From: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <[email protected]>
- what's next for the linux kernel?
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Free swap suspend from dependency on PageReserved
- Next by Date: Re: [Keyrings] [PATCH] Keys: Add LSM hooks for key management
- Previous by thread: Re: what's next for the linux kernel?
- Next by thread: Re: what's next for the linux kernel?
- Index(es):
 |