Re: [PATCH] ide-cd cleanup (casts, whitespace and codingstyle)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 04 2005, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> On 10/4/05, Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 12:17:56AM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > > --- linux-2.6.14-rc3-git3-orig/drivers/ide/ide-cd.c
> > > +++ linux-2.6.14-rc3-git3/drivers/ide/ide-cd.c
> >
> > What was wrong with these ones? [snipping the rest]
> >
> 
> Nothing much, simply that as far as I know, the common coding style is
> that function declarations/definitions should be on one line and if
> that line can't fit in 80 chars then arguments are moved to the next
> line and indented by two tabs. That's the style I believe is the most
> official one (if such a thing exists), so that's the style I changed
> everything throughout the file to obey.

That is by no means the common style. What I usually do is indent the
arguments so the match up with the first line.

> > >  static int cdrom_log_sense(ide_drive_t *drive, struct request *rq,
> > > -                        struct request_sense *sense)
> > > +             struct request_sense *sense)

This is a mess. So NACK on this patch. And why are you changing the
driver version for non-functional changes?

And I prefer a space after a cast. And regardless of what others may
think, I do indent cases in a switch unless it's tight for space.

-- 
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux