On 09/29/05 11:08, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Luben Tuikov wrote:
>
>> hardware implementation (interconnect, SAM 4.15, 1.3)
>> firmware implementation (interconnect, SDS, SAM 4.6, 1.3)
>> LLDD (SAM, section 5, 6, 7)
>> Transport Layer (SAM 4.15, SAS)
>> SCSI Core (SAM section 4,5,8)
>> Commmand Sets (SAM section 1)
>
>
> Transport class + libsas achieves this.
This is *WRONG*. (see below)
And it doesn't "achieve" this. Stop the FUD.
There is a _reason_ why it is the way it is.
> Maybe I will have to demonstrate using code...
Jeff,
There is a _reason_ why technical people separate concepts
in _layers_.
There is a _reason_ why technical people use Object Oriented
Paradigms describing models and design.
Do you know _what_ that reason is?
Or should I leave you to "demonstrate with code"?
Seeing that you keep _persisting_ in your ways,
I'll leave it for you to "enrich" Linux SCSI in
your "demonstrate with code".
Luben
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |