On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 02:07 +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> Ok, so it seems that there's agreement that the other two inlines in
> the patch makes sense, but the malloc() is not clear cut.
>
> Since this is in initramfs after all it doesn't make that big a
> difference overall, so I'll just send in a patch that inlines the
> other two functions but leaves malloc() alone.
>
Well, they're not particularly performance critical, and everything
is marked init anyway so I don't know why you would bother changing
anything ;)
--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |